Return to Office Mandates : Why Gen Z Isn’t Buying In

Hopefully you’ve been following the ‘From X to Z’ podcast series on Purple Acorn in which myself and Danielle Farage talk about the world of work – and workplace trends and issues – from the perspective of two very different generations!

Last week we had a good conversation about RTO mandates and what managers and leaders often don’t understand (or in some cases don’t want to understand) about why the Gen Z workforce are less likely to buy in.

I’ll share the full conversation at the end of this newsletter, but here’s my blog on the key takeaways from our conversation.

The Great RTO Push and the Generational Divide

With companies increasingly pushing for return-to-office (RTO) mandates, employees – particularly Gen Z – are pushing back. Leadership teams – which are often composed of older generations – often argue that physical presence is essential for productivity, collaboration, and culture. And probably don’t often mention that they are used to managing and supporting people who are sat in front of them!

However, the overall workforce’s expectations have shifted dramatically, and Gen Z, in particular, is questioning whether the traditional office model still makes sense.

The reality is that remote work existed before the pandemic – it just wasn’t mainstream. In the chat I reference research that myself and Matt Alder did in partnership with Kelly back in 2017/18 in which we found around two-thirds of the 18,000 jobseekers surveyed saying that they preferred to work (and believed they had the tools and support to work) remotely, and didn’t feel the need to be in a physical location to feel seen.

The forced shift to remote work during COVID-19 didn’t create a preference for flexibility; it simply validated that many jobs can be done efficiently outside of a traditional office environment. Now, as employers attempt to reinstate old norms, younger workers are finding it difficult to justify why they should comply.

Does Gen Z Hate the Office?

It’s a common misconception that Gen Z wants to work entirely from home. In truth, only about 10% of Gen Z workers want to be in an office full-time, but that doesn’t mean they reject in-person collaboration altogether. Many prefer hybrid work models, where they can maintain flexibility while still engaging in face-to-face interactions when necessary.

What Gen Z does resent is the idea that office attendance equals productivity. Unlike older generations who learned workplace skills by shadowing colleagues in a physical setting, Gen Z workers have grown up in a world where information is instantly available, and they have access to what they need to know as and when they need to know it.They don’t rely on being physically present to learn or contribute meaningfully, and instead value efficiency, autonomy, and meaningful work over rigid attendance policies.

The Productivity Paradox: Is RTO Actually Helping?

One of the most glaring issues Gen Z seems to have with return-to-office mandates is the lack of clear reasoning behind them. Many employees find themselves returning to the office only to sit in virtual meetings all day – meetings they could have attended just as effectively from home. This begs the question : If in-person collaboration is the goal, why are so many workers spending their office days glued to video calls?

Productivity should be measured by output, not location. If employees can complete their work efficiently from home, forcing them into an office for the sake of optics feels counterproductive. Younger workers, in particular, are questioning the logic of spending time and money commuting just to do the same tasks they could accomplish remotely.

Economic Realities: The Cost of Showing Up

For many Gen Z workers, the financial burden of returning to the office is another major concern. Wages have stagnated, while the cost of living – especially housing – has skyrocketed. Unlike previous generations who saw home ownership as a feasible goal early in their careers, many young professionals today struggle to afford rent, let alone save for a house.

Given these economic realities, the traditional corporate incentives – such as promotions and pay rises tied to office visibility – hold less appeal. If young workers don’t see a direct financial benefit to commuting, they are less likely to buy into the RTO narrative.

Moreover, the old model of employer loyalty is breaking down.

Previous generations stayed at one company for decades because they were rewarded with pensions, bonuses and long-term job security. Today, those benefits are rare. As a result, Gen Z sees no reason to sacrifice their personal wellbeing for a system that doesn’t prioritise them in return.

Rethinking Workplace Incentives

If companies want to attract and retain young talent, they need to rethink the benefits they offer. Traditional perks like office snacks, breakout rooms – and ping-pong tables! – don’t hold much weight in a world where employees value work-life balance over performative engagement. People need a reason to return a fixed location, and one that makes sense to them.

Companies need to consider relevant and much needed benefits that directly address employees’ real-life needs, such as:

  • Covering commuter costs – subsidised travel, help with petrol/gas, or parking reimbursement
  • Providing meal stipends for days spent in the office
  • Offering gym memberships or wellness programs to support employee health
  • Prioritising professional development with mentorship opportunities and skills training tailored to their particular career goals and interests.

The Future of Work: Adapt or Lose Talent

Companies that insist on rigid return-to-office policies without clear benefits are at risk of losing their best talent to competitors that embrace flexibility. Gen Z isn’t just rejecting the office – they’re rejecting outdated workplace norms that prioritise presence and an element of control over trust, and also presence over productivity.

Instead of enforcing blanket mandates, leaders should ask themselves: What is the real goal of returning to the office? If the answer is collaboration, mentorship, and culture-building, those goals can be achieved through intentional, flexible policies rather than strict attendance requirements.

In industries like manufacturing, healthcare, transportation and construction, where remote work isn’t usually a viable option, companies need to rethink how they attract young workers. Higher wages, better career development opportunities, and improved working conditions will be necessary to prevent talent shortages.

The workplace is evolving, and so are employee expectations. Companies that adapt will thrive, while those that cling to outdated models will struggle to attract and retain top talent. The choice is clear: Listen to your workforce, or risk losing them to those who do.

Check out my full conversation with Danielle Farage here:

Addressing People Problems in the Workplace: A Human-Centric Approach for HR

Modern work environments can be complex. When you mix remote/hybrid teams, multi-generational workforces, varied worker relationships (from fractional and contract to consulting and full-time employment) and technology, it’s clear that addressing people problems within the business will require much more than traditional HR protocols.

However, one of the key themes in my latest podcast conversation HR and The Complexity of People Problems – with award winning author, speaker and coach Zena Everett 🎤 – was that whilst these complexities have the potential to create misunderstandings and miscommunications, they also present modern HR professionals with an opportunity to foster and champion a more human-centric approach to dealing with people – an approach that emphasises emotional intelligence, open dialogue, and strategic coaching.

Zena and I talked about her latest book – Badly Behaved People – and some of the key findings and learnings from her research.

The Problem: Communication Breakdowns in a Busy World

One of the most significant challenges in modern workplaces is what Zena calls the pervasive “crazy busyness” that dominates daily routines. All the workforce – and their leaders and managers alike – find themselves constantly rushing between tasks and meetings often leaving little room for meaningful dialogue. This culture of busyness, coupled with the complexities of remote work and asynchronous communication, easily creates the foundations for misunderstandings and poor performance.

This chaotic environment leads to behaviours that can result in poor communication and understanding, allowing issues to fester. When people are too busy to talk, minor miscommunications can quickly escalate into conflicts. To mitigate this, HR should encourage their organisations to prioritise deliberate, meaningful interactions.

Looking Beyond the Role: Understanding the Whole Person

A common issue that Zena identifies is that managers often don’t fully understand the individuals behind the roles. Employees are not just job titles or numbers on a spreadsheet; they are complex human beings with personal challenges that inevitably influence their work behaviours.

For instance, an employee struggling with external stresses, such as caregiving responsibilities, might react uncharacteristically under pressure. Managers, unaware of these contexts, might misinterpret the behaviour as incompetence or defiance.

HR’s role is to foster an environment where leaders take the time to get to know their team members as individuals, not just as workers. Encouraging genuine conversations can help managers build trust and empathy. However, it’s crucial to approach this sensitively, respecting personal boundaries while showing authentic concern. An important point Zena makes is that effective listening involves not only hearing what is said, but also recognising what is remaining unsaid.

The Power of Dialogue: Moving Beyond Box-Ticking Exercises

Our workplace conversations are too often reduced to perfunctory check-ins or box-ticking exercises. Real dialogue, however, requires emotional intelligence and a genuine commitment to understanding others. HR should promote a culture where conversations are not just about task completion but also about emotional well-being and personal development.

Many workplace conflicts arise not from any malicious intent but from misunderstandings. People behave defensively when they feel misunderstood or threatened. By encouraging open dialogue, HR can help managers create a safe space where team members feel comfortable sharing their concerns and perspectives.

Enquiry-Driven Leadership: Asking the Right Questions

One of the most effective strategies in addressing people problems is enquiry-driven leadership. Unlike traditional, autocratic management styles, enquiry-driven leadership focuses on asking the right questions to encourage self-awareness and problem-solving.

Instead of trying to provide quick answers or solutions, leaders should engage their teams by asking questions that encourage thought and self-reflection. This approach not only empowers employees but also helps foster a greater accountability. When team members feel that their input is valued, they are more likely to take ownership of their tasks and collaborate effectively.

It goes without saying that clear communication of expectations, boundaries, and team vision is essential from leaders and managers. Once these foundations are established, leaders can then transition to a more inquiry-driven approach, allowing employees to think more creatively and solve problems independently.

Coaching Managers: HR’s Strategic Role

HR professionals play a crucial role in equipping managers with the skills needed to navigate complex people problems. This means  coaching managers not just to solve issues but to understand the role they play in team dynamics.

When approached by a manager with a team-related issue, HR should resist the temptation to offer immediate solutions; instead they should coach managers through a series of reflective questions, such as:

  • What do you think is the underlying cause of this issue?
  • Have you had a direct conversation with the team member involved?
  • How could your leadership style be influencing the situation?

By guiding managers through these questions, HR can help them develop the self-awareness needed to address issues more effectively.

Self-Awareness: Recognising Behavioural Impact

Self-awareness is a cornerstone of effective leadership. Zena’s research and insights find that leaders often underestimate the impact their behaviour has on team dynamics – whether it’s a manager’s mood influencing team morale, or non-verbal cues impacting virtual meeting energy, leaders’ actions are contagious

HR can facilitate self-awareness through feedback mechanisms, leadership training, and coaching sessions. Helping leaders to recognise how their actions and words influence team dynamics will enable them to adjust their behaviour, ultimately fostering a more positive workplace culture.

Conclusion: A Human-Centric Approach to People Problems

Addressing people problems in today’s workplace requires HR to champion a human-centric approach. This will involve:

  • Promoting emotional intelligence and genuine dialogue
  • Encouraging enquiry-driven leadership
  • Coaching managers to reflect on their influence
  • Fostering self-awareness at all levels of leadership

By embracing these strategies, HR can help their organisations to navigate the complexities of modern work environments, ensuring that people problems are addressed with empathy, understanding, and strategic insight.

We are in a period of rapid change in the workplace – and the workforce – leading to constant ‘busyness’. HR’s role as a strategic partner is now more critical than ever. By focusing on emotional intelligence, open dialogue, and enquiry-driven leadership, HR can transform people problems into opportunities for growth and collaboration.

You can listen to full podcast conversation here

How AI Can Help Create Purpose Driven Work

There can be little doubt that AI has the capability to reshape organisations, giving businesses of all sizes an opportunity to use it not just for efficiency but to help foster a purpose-driven work culture, that can lead to better retention, higher engagement and more meaningful work.  Responsible AI integration will also help to empower employees and enhance collaboration, maintaining ethical and human-centred values within businesses.

In the coming weeks I’ll be speaking at HR Tech Europe, CIPD Scotland, In House Recruitment Expo and the inaugural Employee Xperience Expo and, perhaps unsurprisingly (!), amongst the topics I’ll be talking about will be the need to maintain humanity and human connection in an AI world, how we can harness AI to create meaningful work experiences, and the best ways to leverage AI for better recruitment.

From the various conversations I’ve had and research I’ve seen whilst preparing, I’m putting together some of the ways in which AI can help to create purpose driven work, and I’m sharing a few of them here. Let me know what you think.

Defining Purpose with AI

A strong purpose is the foundation of any thriving and meaningful workplace culture, and AI can help organisations refine their mission by providing data-driven insights into employee engagement, customer needs, and societal impact. AI-powered analytics can be used to align business goals with core values, ensuring that every decision supports a broader mission beyond profits.

For example, AI-driven employee sentiment analysis can gauge how well employees connect with the company’s mission. By tracking engagement patterns, leadership can identify areas where cultural reinforcement might be needed and make real-time adjustments to help strengthen alignment with company purpose.

Enhancing, Not Replacing, Human Work

One of the most recurring significant concerns about AI is job displacement. However, when implemented carefully, AI should be used to enhance rather than replace human work. By automating repetitive and time-consuming tasks, AI allows employees to focus on more meaningful, creative, satisfying and strategic contributions.

One straightforward example comes from customer services and the way AI-powered chatbots can handle routine customer inquiries, freeing up time for customer service representatives to engage in more personalised interactions that can lead to better outcomes and customer retention.

Similarly, AI-driven project management tools can streamline workflows, allowing employees to concentrate on innovation and problem-solving rather than administrative tasks.

Promoting Human-AI Collaboration

Rather than fully automating processes, AI should function as more of an assistant or support to the human workforce. The best AI applications can enhance decision-making, and offer insights that complement and support human judgment.

One example from hiring is that AI-driven recruitment tools should be able to help HR teams identify the best candidates, leaving human recruiters to assess cultural fit and emotional intelligence. AI-powered data analytics can provide business leaders with real-time insights, but final decisions should take into account human expertise and perceptions, and ethical considerations.

Improving Employee Wellbeing and Experience

Important ways in which AI can help promote employee wellbeing and help improve the employee experience are by optimising workloads, personalising career development, and identifying burnout risks. AI-driven HR platforms can recommend learning opportunities specifically tailored to an individual’s career aspirations and skills, which would help drive a culture of personal and professional up-skilling and growth.

And AI-powered wellness programs can analyse work patterns and suggest breaks or workload redistribution, which can help employees maintain a healthy work balance.

AI offers a real opportunity to create workplaces that are not only efficient, effective, supportive and also purpose-driven. By using AI to enhance meaningful work, support ethical decision-making, and empower employees, organisations can build cultures that inspire and sustain long-term engagement.

Ultimately, AI should be seen as a tool that amplifies human potential rather than replaces it. When integrated carefully, AI can help companies create work environments where employees feel engaged, valued, supported, and have a real sense of connection with the organisational purpose.

Hope I get to see some of you at the various events I’ve mentioned. Would be great to grab a coffee and find out what you see as the role of AI in creating and enhancing purpose driven work!

Are Workplace Friendships the Secret Ingredient to Employee Retention?

Employe Attrition – or rather worsening Employee Retention – is top of mind for most businesses. Over the last 2 to 3 years there definitely seems to have been an increase in employee mobility, whether through a post pandemic reaction to our relationship with work, or because the workforce feel they now have more agency in choosing when, where and how they work….and who for and with.

Award winning and best selling author Michael Arena has done some research into this, sparked by Gallup research that indicated 51% of the US workforce were either actively – or keeping a watch – looking for new roles. The three reasons that consistently surface for job mobility are poor pay and rewards, lack of career growth opportunities, and the need to find more flexible working arrangements.

However what if there was another reason, not often talked about? Less expensive and more human?

One of my main research areas recently has been the concept of keeping Humanity in an AI world. Or rather, putting the Humanity into Human Resources in an AI driven world. Research increasingly indicates that workplace friendships can play a pivotal role in employee retention. Employees who have strong social connections with colleagues are significantly more likely to stay, creating a unique opportunity for HR professionals to reimagine retention strategies.

So how can businesses harness the power of workplace friendships to build – and retain – a more connected, engaged, and loyal workforce?

There are four areas that need attention.

Creating Opportunities for Employees to Connect

To develop the relationships that will lead to a settled and productive workforce we need to start by looking at the opportunities for interaction and support. Certainly in-person and virtual meet up sessions can be very useful for this – whether it’s interest or hobby based meet-ups, or collaborative projects based on current work priorities.

Employee led interest groups are a great way to develop this. Many years ago, when social media was a relatively new concept, I started a weekly lunchtime get together at the business I was with for colleagues interested to find out more about social media channels, how to use them for friends, family or personal interest, and how to build connections.

It was a loose arrangement – so there was no compulsion to attend – but it certainly helped people within the business connect, especially if they worked in different areas.

Look For Collaborative Project Opportunities

Again, these can be work related or personal interest based, but getting collaboration between colleagues who work in different areas, and rarely get the opportunity work together, can lead to a settled and harmonious culture within the business. It also gives colleagues who don’t work in the same area a chance to understand the full range of skills, knowledge and perspectives from people around the business. Any project can be work related, environment related, or mutual upskilling or knowledge sharing.

Strengthening Workplace Connections

Organisational network analysis can help to evaluate workplace relationships – strong and weak – and, most importantly, can identify anyone at risk of being isolated or disassociated from the organisation culturally. Employee surveys can often help with this, and any measure of group participation in activities that help engagement.

Fostering an Inclusive Culture of Belonging

Creating a sense of belonging is essential. One way to help promote this is through Employee Resource Groups, particularly those that support colleagues in areas such as DEI & B. These can provide spaces for individuals with similar backgrounds or interests to connect.

Getting leadership support – and sponsorship – is usually crucial to building successful ERGs to show that leaders are taking issues seriously and are making sure that their people get the support they need. These programmes should be designed to be open to everyone within the organisation, accommodating all neurotypes and physical abilities.

Does Gen Z Have It Harder? The Case for Supporting All Employees

Every generation probably believes that they’ve had the hardest path to success in their careers. However, when it comes to Gen Z, there is evidence to suggest that they might genuinely face greater challenges in building careers and achieving financial independence. Today’s emerging workforce are facing a perfect storm of economic instability, housing unaffordability, and job precarity – all of which are reshaping how they approach life and work.

I’ve been looking into some Financial Times research pulled from diverse sources such as the ONS, Resolution Foundation & King’s College London to try and make sense of the Gen Z prospects.

A Tougher Climb to Financial Independence

For Gen Z, the cost of living is comparatively higher than ever, whilst wage growth has been lagging behind for a time. Home ownership, once a key milestone of adulthood, is increasingly out of reach, unless you’re able to bank at The Bank of Mum & Dad (or The Bank of Family)  – with research indicating that only 10% of under-25s own homes, compared to 24% two decades ago.

Even renting has become a struggle with many Gen Z spending nearly half their income on housing. In the UK this has led to around a third of 25-27 year olds continuing to live with parents/family – a stark contrast to the independence most previous generations were able to enjoy at the same age.

Job Market Challenges

The employment landscape is no less daunting. Gen Z has entered the workforce after over a decade of weak wage growth, whilst the rising number of jobs in the gig/freelance economy offer minimal security. Recent increases in the minimum wage have helped in a small way but does little to address systemic issues like underemployment and job instability. These economic realities make it harder for young adults to envision stable, long-term, satisfying careers, making the variety and range of freelance opportunities more attractive.

The Mental Health Toll

Economic struggles don’t just hit wallets  – they take a toll on mental health too. Benefit claims for mental health disorders among 16- to 27-year-olds have more than doubled in three years, driven by a mix of financial insecurity, housing challenges, and the lingering effects of the pandemic. It’s no wonder that two-thirds of older adults believe young people’s mental health is worse than when they were younger.

Changing Social and Lifestyle Norms

Financial instability is also reshaping Gen Z’s social and lifestyle choices. Insecure work and stagnating salaries leave many unable to build their lives around the traditional milestones like home ownership, marriage and starting families. Up to two-thirds have also reported declining social plans due to economic constraints. These shifts underline how deeply economic factors influence not just individual lives but societal trends.

Why Supporting All Employees Matters

While Gen Z’s challenges are unique, they highlight some of the broader issues affecting workers across all generations. Rising housing costs, job insecurity, and mental health struggles don’t respect generational boundaries – they impact everyone, albeit in different ways.

Organisations have a critical role to play in helping to address these challenges. By fostering a culture of understanding and inclusivity, they can create workplaces where all employees, regardless of age or circumstances, feel supported. There are an increasing number of initiatives around areas such as fair compensation, mental health resources, and flexible work arrangements which are not just perks of the job – but are necessities for thriving in today’s economy.

So Gen Z do indeed face steeper obstacles than their more recent predecessors, for whom work was the key to structuring their lives – acquiring a home, settled relationship, personal and family stability, and opportunities for travel, new experiences, and new roles. Without the ability to build that structure it’s no surprise they look for experience, development, variety and independence.

Leaders and managers should start acknowledging the obstacles and constraints to building skills, knowledge and careers and work towards alleviating systemic barriers.

Empowering Gen Z will help build stronger, more equitable workplaces for everyone. Supporting employees isn’t just about addressing generational differences – it’s about recognising and addressing shared human challenges.

What the Latest Research Tells Us About Remote, Flexible and Hybrid Working

In an ever-evolving business landscape shaped by emerging technology, changing personal and generational preferences, and an increased focus on personal wellbeing, flexibility has emerged as a cornerstone of employee satisfaction and retention, and increasingly of organisational success.

Certainly since the Covid-19 pandemic, the structure of work has transformed, with flexibility continually emerging as a non-negotiable expectation among workers, especially younger generations. This shift has revealed generational differences about how, when and why we work, and also led to growing demands for a different approach to work-life balance.

When it comes to trying to make sense of the latest trends and innovations, one of my go to people is experienced HR Leader, author, researcher, lecturer – and friend – Gemma Dale. We recorded a podcast chat almost 2 years ago about the then emerging trends, and I recently invited Gemma back to the HR Means Business podcast so that we could talk through some of the latest research and thinking.

The Rise of Flexibility as a Workforce Demand

Recent surveys have found that nearly half of graduates will dismiss job offers that lacking a hybrid or flexible structure. This trend is particularly strong among Gen Z, who increasingly prioritise flexibility and autonomy over traditional workplace values. Unlike previous generations, they are unwilling to subscribe to the classic “9-to-5” mindset, with its promise of advancement through sheer time, effort and presence in the office. They are motivated not just by career progression but by achieving an acceptable work-life balance and sense of autonomy in their roles. This change marks a clear departure from past norms, challenging senior leaders to rethink what engagement, productivity, and presence look like in the modern workplace.

During my chat with Gemma we talked about the increasing use of the expression “organisational nostalgia” which has grown as a way to describe some leaders’ longing for the traditional, fixed location work model. This nostalgic view is often rooted in comfort with established routines and the in-person culture.

However, attempts to return to these traditional models clash with the evolving preferences of younger generations, which means leaders must try to align with these shifting dynamics to remain relevant – and retain talent.

Historical Perspective: Old Concepts, New Realities

The idea of remote and flexible work isn’t new. Back in 1975, NASA scientist Jack Nilles coined the concept of “teleworking” as a solution to the American oil crisis. He envisioned smaller, localised work hubs to save on commute costs and time. By the 1990s, the concept had evolved, though it continued to face cultural resistance from managers and leaders who preferred physical attendance as a way to manage workflows.

Scepticism and bias seem to have long plagued our attitudes to remote work, mainly through managers fearing reduced productivity and accountability when workers aren’t physically present. Despite all the technological advancements the workplace has seen over the last 20 years or more that make remote and flexible work highly feasible, these biases remain.

This scepticism manifests in what many commentators call “flex shaming,” where remote workers are sometimes viewed as less committed or hardworking. Such perceptions are counterproductive, especially as the data shows flexible work boosts morale, mental health, and retention rates. Today’s employers need to address these biases directly to foster a healthy, trusting workplace culture.

Flexibility as a Retention Strategy

Research also consistently demonstrates that employees prioritse flexible working conditions, to the point of considering it nearly as valuable as an 8% salary increase. The competition for top talent has intensified, with 72% of UK hiring managers reporting that they’ve lost employees to firms offering more flexible options. This trend isn’t limited to specific industries; it’s a universal preference, spanning generations and career stages – flexibility isn’t just about physical location.

Increasingly, many organisations are beginning to recognise that offering flexibility isn’t just about meeting employee demands – it’s a strategic decision that can enhance recruitment and retention. By supporting remote and hybrid work, businesses show respect for workers’ autonomy and trust, fostering loyalty and long-term engagement.

On the other hand, companies that resist flexibility – like Amazon’s recent high-profile mandating a five day in-office policy – risk alienating employees and facing a talent drain.

Mental Health and WellBeing Benefits

Research tells us that flexible working arrangements also provide profound mental health benefits. Remote work allows people to reclaim commuting time for personal pursuits, like exercising, cooking, or spending time with loved ones. The cumulative effects of these small shifts can have a significant positive impact on mental health and wellbeing.

Employees report reduced stress and improved satisfaction when they have more control over their schedules, enabling them to balance personal responsibilities more effectively.

However, these benefits depend on supportive organisational policies. Companies that offer flexibility in name only, while imposing a more rigid – and distrustful – oversight, risk creating a negative environment that undermines employee wellbeing. Encouraging open dialogue and supporting flexible work policies are key to cultivating a healthy, productive culture.

The New Workplace? : Coffee Squatting and Four-Day Weeks

The nature of the modern workplace is still evolving to meet the increased demands for remote, flexible, hybrid and asynchronous working patterns. Concepts like the four-day workweek are gaining traction, with a growing movement advocating for shorter weeks without reducing pay. While this model is still under research, some early trials have shown promise, suggesting that reduced hours may improve employee satisfaction and productivity.

One of the many new trends that the research found was that of “coffee squatting” – where remote workers spend extended hours working from coffee shops. While this arrangement provides a casual and enjoyable workspace, particularly for those who have little – or no – dedicated space at home, it has led to challenges for local businesses that rely on customer turnover, leading to some coffee shops implementing policies to address the strain.

Embracing Change for Future Success

The conversation around remote, flexible and hybrid work is far from over. Leaders who lean into this shift and adopt a mindset of openness and adaptability will be better equipped to navigate the challenges and opportunities of the modern workplace and increasing demands for flexibility from the emerging workforce.

Flexibility isn’t just a trend; it’s a fundamental change in how people work and live. As businesses continue to adapt, the organisations that embrace these dynamics are likely to attract the most engaged, productive, and innovative talent, setting themselves apart in a rapidly evolving world.

You can listen to my full conversation with Gemma Dale here – https://www.hrhappyhour.net/episodes/the-evolution-of-remote-flexible-working-practices/ – or by clicking on the image below

Why High Performers Leave Organisations and What You Can do to Retain Them

Top performers are often the backbone of organisations. Whilst everyone within the business has an important role to play in delivering on the organisational promise and outcomes, it’s often the top performers who are looked to for driving innovation, productivity, and growth.

However, retaining them increasingly needs more than competitive salaries, perks and recognition; it demands a more intentional approach to leadership that contributes to an environment in which high performers feel valued and motivated, that they matter, and are committed to staying.

I’ve looked at some recent research from author, researcher and professor Zach Mercurio, Ph.D., whose book ‘The Power of Mattering’ is published next year. I see 4 ways in which leaders can achieve this:

Notice and Acknowledge Top Performers

Top performers often operate under the radar because they can consistently deliver results without creating problems – which can lead to feelings of invisibility, especially if they’re not being recognised for their efforts.

Leaders should actively notice all the people within the organisation – for high performers they need top make time for regular, meaningful check-ins that go beyond transactional updates. Questions around workload, and the offering of support, will often be noticed. Zach suggests something called “stoplight check-ins”-  where employees share their current energy levels (green, yellow, or red), which can provide real insights into how they feel about their wellbeing.

Provide Specific and Meaningful Feedback

Generic feedback – think back to old school reports with advice like “good work” or “keep it up” which offered encouragement to many but not might seem genuine for top performers. Leaders should be able to offer more detailed affirmation that highlights their specific contributions and impact. This means that feedback should be precise:

  • Describe the context: Highlighting a specific project or situation where their contributions stood out
  • Name the behaviours: Specify what they did that made a difference
  • Explain the impact: Share how their actions have positively affected and impacted the team, organisation, or clients.

Meaningful feedback doesn’t just motivate high performers but can also reinforce their sense of purpose and belonging to the business.

Show Them They’re Needed

High performers often operate at their best levels when they know their work is indispensable. Leaders should try to help them understand their value by linking their efforts to measurable outcomes. For example, data  van be used to demonstrate how their contributions have driven results – eg. higher customer satisfaction scores or increased revenue.

Find simple yet powerful phrases that acknowledge how their skills and perspectives are critical to their teams’ success.

Strengthen Personal Connections

The relationship our people have with their managers and leaders often play a pivotal role in employee retention. High performers want to feel understood and supported by their managers and leaders. Ways to engage with them on a more personal level to help improve this are:

  • Prioritising wellbeing: Showing genuine concern for their mental and emotional health
  • Sharing your own experiences: Open up about your own challenges or anxieties can create an important bond
  • Being accessible: Let them know they can approach you with concerns or ideas anytime

Retaining top performers – in fact, retaining all your people – is not about grand gestures but about consistent, intentional actions that make them feel noticed, affirmed, and needed.

By investing in these relationships, and reinforcing their importance to the business, you can create an environment where your best talent chooses to stay and thrive.

HR Challenges and Opportunities for 2025

Organisations are facing growing challenges, all of which are making the role of an HR professional increasingly complex and multi-faceted. As business navigates economic uncertainty, whilst supporting their employees’ mental health and wellbeing, we see almost daily debates online about evolving work models and working arrangements, and how to manage the emerging Gen Z workforce. That’s before we mention the role of AI and how it might impact – positively – the HR workload.

I’ve been looking at some recent research from the team at McKinsey & Company that identified five key areas that are contributing to this workload, but which also present opportunities for a better way of working. With stress on the rise, and some workforces complaining of ‘change fatigue’ it’s time to build trust within our teams and offer real support and enablement for our people.

Increasing Workload and Demands

The responsibilities on HR teams have escalated with modern HR departments not only tasked with traditional hiring, onboarding and compliance but also with addressing the more complicated areas that I outlined in the introduction – mental health and wellbeing support, remote/flexible/hybrid work policies, and a general dissatisfaction with the overall employee experience.

This increase in workload creates a dual tension, with HR teams managing a broader spectrum of demands while ensuring the wellbeing and retention of their people. The need for effective and supportive people management is stronger than ever, but with limited resources and growing tasks many HR teams find themselves stretched thinly.

Pressure of Strategic Involvement Without Necessary Authority

Whilst HR has historically, and wrongly, often been seen as more of a ‘support’ role, today’s organisations increasingly need their HR teams to be strategic partners. However, while they are called upon to influence company culture and policy more strongly, the main question is – do they have the authority to drive real change?

This can leave HR teams in a frustrating position – advisors on transformative strategies but lacking the decision-making authority to oversee their strategies fully realised for real change. HR needs to be part of the strategic conversation from the start, with the authority to influence and make impactful strategic decisions.

Battling ‘Change Fatigue’

Organisations are in a constant state of adaptation be it addressing remote & flexible work transitions, engaging and retaining the Gen Z workforce, building meaningful experiences and implementing AI effectively.

Change is necessary for most organisations, but can also create “change fatigue” among employees and managers if not implemented effectively. For HR teams, who are responsible for implementing and explaining these shifts, it could feel like an endless cycle of implementation without the time to let one change settle before the next is introduced.

Building resilience and carefully pacing transformations are crucial for preventing burnout within HR teams.

Potential Trust Deficits Between HR, Employees, and Leadership

There is often a ‘trust gap’ in organisations between employees, HR, and leadership, with HR teams finding themselves in a delicate balance – representing the company’s priorities whilst advocating for employees. This balancing act could lead to a perception that HR is not genuinely aligned with employees’ needs – thereby damaging trust – or too aligned with senior management.

For HR to be effective mediators between employees and leadership, it is essential that organisations to prioritise transparent, honest communication and to help HR clearly demonstrate the organisational commitment to employee welfare.

Technology’s Role in HR: Efficiency or Extra Burden?

While technology has the potential to streamline HR processes, it sometimes adds additional layers of responsibility. Generative AI, for instance, holds promise for enhancing recruitment, data analysis, and even employee engagement, though has the potential to detract from some of the more creative tasks that our people enjoy doing. Without proper implementation, these technologies can also impose more administrative duties, detracting from the human-centred support HR is meant to provide.

For technology to be effective, it should ease, support and provide smoother experiences for our people, not increase the workload, allowing HR teams to focus more fully on strategic support and enablement to our people.

Turning Challenges into Opportunities

Despite these mounting pressures, HR professionals can take steps to mitigate them and foster a more supportive organisational climate. Prioritising authentic communication and trust-building practices can help bridge any gaps between HR, leadership, and employees. In the long run, enabling HR to work as a full strategic partner – and not be seen as a support or adjunct function – will help to empower the whole organisation to be more adaptive, resilient, and people-focused.

Today’s HR professionals are dealing with some of the most challenging dynamics the workforce has seen. Yet, with the right support and authority they have the potential to transform these into positive experiences, fostering a workplace where employees thrive, organisations adapt smoothly and successfully, and the true value of HR can be recognised and rewarded.

What HR Leaders Need to Know About AI, Employee Experience, and Burnout

As AI becomes more integrated into every area of our working lives, it is important that HR leaders understand how this technology will not just impact productivity, but also influence the overall employee experience. I recently had a podcast chat with Gabriela (Gabby) Burlacu, senior manager at the Upwork Research Institute, about their research in to how AI is reshaping work, and the resulting implications for productivity, job satisfaction, burnout, and skill development.

The Productivity Paradox: Why AI Alone Isn’t Enough

One of the key points we discussed was why, despite the increasing use of AI, organisations have not seen the expected leaps in productivity. This could be because AI has been layered onto existing work models without rethinking workflows, organisational structures, or roles, creating a “productivity paradox” – essentially where AI increases the speed of certain tasks but doesn’t translate into overall gains because companies are still operating with outdated processes.

For HR leaders, this highlights the need to think beyond simply adopting AI tools and shifting focus towards how work is organised. Introducing AI requires a holistic shift in how teams collaborate, how workflows are designed, and how outcomes are measured. Simply adding AI to existing frameworks risks overwhelming employees, leading to burnout rather than increased efficiency.

AI and Job Satisfaction: Balancing Automation with Meaningful Work

Another concern raised is the potential for AI to reduce job satisfaction. Many of the tasks that AI can now automate are those that employees find fulfilling. Whether it’s drafting a report, organising data, or managing small projects, these tasks often give workers a sense of accomplishment. Removing these elements could unintentionally strip away the aspects of work that keep employees engaged and motivated.

HR leaders should consider how to balance automation with opportunities for meaningful work. While AI can take over more repetitive tasks, it’s crucial to ensure that employees still feel a sense of purpose and contribution. Finding ways to engage employees in more strategic, creative, or interpersonal tasks can mitigate the potential downsides of automation.

The Double-Edged Sword of AI: Boosting Some Employees While Undermining Others

AI also has a unique impact on employee performance. Gabby Burlacu talks about how AI tends to boost the productivity of lower-performing employees, helping them match the output of higher performers. While this can be seen as a positive outcome for overall team performance, it can raise concerns for high performers who may feel their contributions are being diluted.

For organisations that have historically relied on developing high performers to drive success, this could lead to disengagement. HR leaders should begin to rethink how performance is measured and rewarded in an AI-enabled workplace. A high performer in an AI-driven environment may look very different from a high performer in the past. Performance metrics need to evolve to reflect creativity, strategic thinking, and leadership skills rather than just raw output.

AI and Skill Development: Are We Sacrificing Learning for Efficiency?

One of the more concerning impacts of AI could be on skill development. Many tasks that AI can now perform, such as basic data analysis or drafting reports, are traditionally entry-level tasks that help employees build fundamental skills. If these tasks are automated, early-career workers may miss out on critical learning experiences that help them build skills in how to prioritise, communicate, and problem-solve.

HR leaders need to address this skills gap by rethinking how learning and development (L&D) is structured. Rather than focusing solely on efficiency, organisations should ensure that employees are gaining the hands-on experiences they need to grow. This could involve creating new opportunities for skill development, maybe shifting focus toward more complex problem-solving tasks.

Leveraging Freelancers and Non-Traditional Talent

As AI reshapes the workforce, another trend we see gaining traction is the use of freelancers and non-traditional talent to fill skill gaps. Freelancers often come equipped with up-to-date AI skills, providing organisations with the agility to implement AI without waiting for internal training programs to catch up. For HR leaders, this presents an opportunity to think creatively about workforce composition, leveraging a mix of full-time employees and freelancers to meet evolving business needs – an approach I often refer to as Total talent Thinking.

Co-Creating Metrics to Avoid Burnout

Finally, one of the most actionable insights from our conversation is the importance of including employees in discussions around productivity metrics. Gabby Burlacu points out that employees who have a say in how their performance is measured tend to feel less overwhelmed and more engaged. In an AI-driven workplace, where productivity expectations may shift rapidly, co-creating metrics with employees ensures that they understand what is expected and feel part of the process.

For HR leaders, this co-creation process is key to managing burnout. Instead of top-down mandates that employees may find unrealistic or unclear, HR can work with teams to develop productivity measures that reflect the realities of using AI. Using a more inclusive approach could help reduce stress and ensure that employees feel supported during the transition to AI-enhanced work environments.

Rethinking Work in the Age of AI

AI is undoubtedly a powerful tool, but its success depends on how effectively organisations can adapt their structures, workflows, and cultures to integrate it. For HR leaders, the key challenges lie in balancing the efficiency gains with the need to offer meaningful work, skill development, and employee wellbeing.

By rethinking performance metrics, fostering skill development, and engaging employees in co-creating the future of work, organisations can harness AI’s potential without sacrificing employee experience or burning out their workforce.

You can listen to the full conversation at https://www.hrhappyhour.net/episodes/will-ai-help-to-reduce-employee-burnout-or-to-increase-it/

Thoughts and Conversations From HR Technology Conference & Expo 2024

I thoroughly enjoyed the recent HR Technology Conference & Exposition. For me it was certainly the best of the 3 post-covid events and had a real energy and dynamism with lots of conversation and interaction. The Expo floor was full, and whilst certain topics (I’m looking at you AI!) seemed to dominate many of the chats there was – for me – a clear liveliness around making better workplaces, using data to gain real insights to help and support, and a focus on the role of leadership to guide during uncertain business – and political – times.

Five things stood out for me:

Retention as the New Recruitment

I see a noticeable shift toward focusing on employee retention rather than solely recruitment. Investment in employee experience, engagement, and well-being is now a major priority for organisations. I have been talking about this trend quite a bit this year and certainly those I spoke to at HR Tech agreed that their focus had shifted towards retention.

Upskilling and Enablement

Organisations are increasingly focused on supporting their employees’ development by providing opportunities for upskilling and enabling them to be their best selves at work, especially in a time of global uncertainty. People want access to what they need to know, as and when they ned to know it, and organisations are investing in this.

Impact of AI on Engagement

While AI can offer significant productivity and efficiency gains, I am concerned that it could diminish employee engagement by taking over tasks that people enjoy, potentially leaving them with less fulfilling work. We do need to be careful about how we use AI to replace creative and more human tasks.

AI’s Role in Sentiment Analysis

I see AI being increasingly used for sentiment analysis and gaining insights into how employees feel, which helps leaders and managers better understand the workforce’s mood and engagement. There is a definite shift towards gaining better understanding of who our people are thinking and feeling and the positive impact of tools such as recognition.

Putting the Humanity into Human Resources

This is something I’ve been speaking about this year and it was good to talk with attendees and vendors who see the need for a more personal, human approach to how we hire, engage and retain our people. I think that while we are still exploring ways in which AI can help us understand things like mood and sentiment, we need to be able to trust it, though I do remain a bit sceptical about potential over-reliance on AI for decision making without ensuring depth and understanding behind its recommendations.

During the event I was able to record a podcast episode on HR Happy Hour with my friends from H3 HR Advisors Trish (McFarlane) Steed and Steve Boese about what we had seen at HR Tech that had impressed us and what we thought the future might hold.

You can listen to our full conversation here: